1501 East Hennepin Avenue | Minneapolis, MN 55414
posted on 1/8/10 by Rett Martin
How many times have you been asked to move something "above the fold" on the homepage of a website? In this post we'll start with a definition of the "fold" term itself, look at some of the web design principles we can extract from this print term, and then give some recommendations on how to handle the situation should it ever arise.
There were a couple links passed around Clockwork last month sparking further discussion about "the Fold." The first was Google Browser Size, which lets you type in a url and see an overlay of statistics relating to browser size. The second was http://www.thereisnopagefold.com/ where the url pretty much sums it up.
Both sites are interesting and useful in their own way, but neither provides the context you might need when discussing the fold issue with a client. The Browser Size tool implies that a "donate now" button must be at the top of your page, while the other link could be a bit too cynical to send to a client. So let's begin with a definitition of the fold.
The "Fold" is a graphic design term that refers to the crease in a newspaper, dividing the front page into upper and lower halves. Since newspapers are displayed folded up in a stand, only the top half is visible. This means the most important information, or what the editors believe will help sell the newspaper, is placed "above the fold."
In web design, this term has been adapted to mean the portion of the web page that can be viewed without scrolling. The fold then is the bottom of a web user's browser window.

A website is a lot like a newspaper, so it's a good analogy to have. At a high level, we can learn the following from the "above the fold" rule:

Unfortunately though, a newspaper and a website are fundamentally different and we shouldn't be so literal as to assume the following:
These last three points are where web designers often find ourselves scratching our heads. We know that the fold is a moving target, and really it's a moot point if you've done your job creating a clear information hierarchy. But regardless, it still comes up and it's our job to educate any client asking us to make changes based on the fold. Here are some things to point out:
There are some great things to learn from the "above the fold" rule, but if taken too literally the user experience will actually suffer. This is not print design, and there is no specific pixel number that divides the top of the page from the bottom. Even if you pick an arbitrary location for the fold, not all of the information needs to be above it. Unlike someone walking by a newspaper folded up on a stand, web users have chosen (in some fashion) to view your homepage, and they will interact with content that interests them. Instead of focusing on the fold itself, make sure your designs have clear information hierarchy and that the homepage captures and communicates your key message.
Above the Fold -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Above_the_fold

We're constantly talking to each other about what's new: a project we're working on, a new site we're obsessed with, or some other geekery. We figured, why not share those conversations with you?
Welcome to our collective mind.
14 Previous comments:
14 Previous comment:
(1) On January 8, 2010, Kary Delaria said:
(2) On January 8, 2010, mac said:
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/blasting-the-myth-of
(3) On January 10, 2010, Paul Annett said:
(4) On January 10, 2010, Alexa Miller said:
(5) On January 11, 2010, Josh Braaten said:
(6) On January 11, 2010, Rett said:
Alexa - I think it's best to give a quick explanation of what the fold is and what parts of it apply to the web (as discussed above). But really what's more important is discussing what goals your clients have for their homepage. Help them figure out what they want the user to do, and then structure the information and design around that. Any time you're cramming too much information into a small area it's only going to confuse someone.
(7) On January 11, 2010, bobby jack said:
(8) On January 11, 2010, Michael said:
In a Tufte-esque sense, I believe that if the information density is too low, I get less done. At times it also feels like an insult to my intelligence -- that I can only comprehend things when cut up into small little pieces. When it is the right content a 12-foot long page can be a wonderful thing.
M.
(9) On January 12, 2010, Ruge said:
I remember going to a client's house who was still operating at 1024x768 despite his native res being 1400x1050 and a lot of the site we designed was not displayed on his resolution!
(10) On January 13, 2010, Nick Trainor said:
This said, I believe from studying the way folks use the websites we optimise that the idea of 'keeping it above the fold' has had its time. I can remove working on sites designed for 640x480 resolution(!) and folks just didn't scroll, but for the "Facebook generation", there is no such proclivity.
More often than not, the call to keep stuff "above the fold" is a failure to see just HOW folks are going to consume your content.
(11) On January 13, 2010, Owen Hughes said:
(12) On January 20, 2010, Rett said:
In this article, what I'm pointing out is that while there are some interesting things to learn from "the fold" analogy, there is no magic line at which web content is consistently cut off for all visitors. And rather than focusing on this moving target, we should concentrate on content strategy and information hierarchy. So I'm definitely not suggesting that visitors want to scroll down just any page, but that they will scroll (and know how to) if you give them a good reason. I'm also not suggesting that every page should be really long, just that we can't use "the fold" as an excuse to cram everything into a small area.
(13) On January 31, 2010, Prashant said:
(14) On February 2, 2010, Sijmen said:
I have to make a note on a little annoyance though – the yellow headings on the white background. It's hardly legible!